•  
  •  
 

University of Lynchburg DMSc Doctoral Project Assignment Repository

University of Lynchburg DMSc Doctoral Project Assignment Repository

Abstract

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has long been avoided in women with a history of breast cancer due to concerns about recurrence, particularly in estrogen receptor–positive cases. However, growing evidence suggests that a universal prohibition is no longer justified. This clinical review examines evolving data on the risks and benefits of HRT in breast cancer survivors and highlights emerging guidance that supports more individualized, evidence-based decision-making.

Recent studies show that while systemic HRT remains generally contraindicated in most hormone-sensitive cancers, carefully selected patients, especially those with estrogen receptor–negative disease or severe menopausal symptoms, may benefit from limited, closely monitored use. Local estrogen therapies for genitourinary symptoms have demonstrated minimal systemic absorption and no meaningful increase in recurrence risk. Yet, many patients continue to receive outdated or overly cautious counseling, leaving symptoms untreated and quality of life diminished.

A comprehensive literature review of studies from 2000 to 2024 reveals a growing consensus that treatment decisions should consider cancer subtype, symptom burden, time since diagnosis, and patient preference. Current guidelines emphasize the importance of shared decision-making and multidisciplinary collaboration. By integrating these principles into survivorship care, clinicians can move beyond outdated assumptions and better address the complex needs of breast cancer survivors experiencing menopause.

Restricted

Available when accessing via a campus IP address or logged in with a University of Lynchburg email address.

Off-campus users can also use 'Off-campus Download' button above for access.

Share

COinS