Presentations

Student Author Information

Taylor NeiserFollow

Access Type

Campus Access Only

Department

Exercise Physiology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of focus tool use on time to complete concentration tasks, in both distracted and nondistracted environments. College-aged subjects (n=12, 75% female) completed two visits, one in each environment. Order of task and focus tool use was randomized across each visit. The tasks included Korner’d, Pegboard, and a computer-based reaction time test. Focus tools included a balloon squeeze, fidget cube, and lower-body theraband use. Time to completion was assessed for each task and was compared between the different tools and environments. A 2x3x4 within-subjects ANOVA was performed to compare mean time to completion between the different trials. There was no significant main effects for environment (F(1,11)=0.83, p>0.05) or tool (F(3,9)=2.41, p>0.05). There was an expected significant main effect for task (F(2,10)=193.93, p<0.00), however there was no significant interaction (F(6,6)=1.80, p>0.05) for environment, tool and task. Results suggest tools did not have any significant effect on task performance. Focus tool use may have benefit for select individuals however best practice for their use remains undetermined.

Faculty Mentor(s)

Jill Lucas

Rights Statement

The right to download or print any portion of this material is granted by the copyright owner only for personal or educational use. The author/creator retains all proprietary rights, including copyright ownership. Any editing, other reproduction or other use of this material by any means requires the express written permission of the copyright owner. Except as provided above, or for any other use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.), you may not reproduce, republish, post, transmit or distribute any material from this web site in any physical or digital form without the permission of the copyright owner of the material.

Share

COinS
 

The effects of upper and lower extremity focus tools on concentration to complete tasks

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of focus tool use on time to complete concentration tasks, in both distracted and nondistracted environments. College-aged subjects (n=12, 75% female) completed two visits, one in each environment. Order of task and focus tool use was randomized across each visit. The tasks included Korner’d, Pegboard, and a computer-based reaction time test. Focus tools included a balloon squeeze, fidget cube, and lower-body theraband use. Time to completion was assessed for each task and was compared between the different tools and environments. A 2x3x4 within-subjects ANOVA was performed to compare mean time to completion between the different trials. There was no significant main effects for environment (F(1,11)=0.83, p>0.05) or tool (F(3,9)=2.41, p>0.05). There was an expected significant main effect for task (F(2,10)=193.93, p<0.00), however there was no significant interaction (F(6,6)=1.80, p>0.05) for environment, tool and task. Results suggest tools did not have any significant effect on task performance. Focus tool use may have benefit for select individuals however best practice for their use remains undetermined.