Poster Session

Examining the Relationship Between Cervical Range of Motion and Proprioceptive Abilities Assessed by Head Position Using a Sensory Motor Control-Oriented Rehabilitation™ LED Laser

Location

Memorial Ballroom, Hall Campus Center

Access Type

Campus Access Only

Entry Number

21

Start Date

4-6-2022 12:00 PM

End Date

4-6-2022 1:15 PM

Department

Biomedical Science

Abstract

It was hypothesized that limited cervical range of motion may cause a decrease in proprioceptive abilities. Therefore, the relationship between cervical range of motion (CROM) and proprioceptive ability was assessed in a sample of convenience of eighteen human subjects of varying ages and genders. Each subject's cervical range of motion was measured using a CROM mechanical goniometer. The subject's CROM was measured in the sagittal, transverse and frontal planes. The average Global Total CROM for participants studied was 336.98 degrees. The subjects then performed a head-to-target repositioning test using a Sensory Motor Control-Oriented Rehabilitation™ LED Laser to evaluate their proprioceptive abilities as a measurement of their head repositioning accuracy (HRA). The repositioning test was performed and the HRA was measured in the sagittal and transverse planes. Coordinate points from the target were converted to linear displacement from the origin of the target. A Pearson correlation coefficient was performed to analyze the relationship between CROM and linear displacement in each plane. The correlation coefficient between CROM and Linear Displacement for flexion was 0.01, for extension was 0.14, for right rotation was 0.28, and for left rotation was 0.17. Right rotation exhibited a fair relationship between CROM and linear displacement, while all other planes showed little to no relationship between CROM and linear displacement.

Faculty Mentor(s)

Dr. Wendy Williamson

Rights Statement

The right to download or print any portion of this material is granted by the copyright owner only for personal or educational use. The author/creator retains all proprietary rights, including copyright ownership. Any editing, other reproduction or other use of this material by any means requires the express written permission of the copyright owner. Except as provided above, or for any other use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.), you may not reproduce, republish, post, transmit or distribute any material from this web site in any physical or digital form without the permission of the copyright owner of the material.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 6th, 12:00 PM Apr 6th, 1:15 PM

Examining the Relationship Between Cervical Range of Motion and Proprioceptive Abilities Assessed by Head Position Using a Sensory Motor Control-Oriented Rehabilitation™ LED Laser

Memorial Ballroom, Hall Campus Center

It was hypothesized that limited cervical range of motion may cause a decrease in proprioceptive abilities. Therefore, the relationship between cervical range of motion (CROM) and proprioceptive ability was assessed in a sample of convenience of eighteen human subjects of varying ages and genders. Each subject's cervical range of motion was measured using a CROM mechanical goniometer. The subject's CROM was measured in the sagittal, transverse and frontal planes. The average Global Total CROM for participants studied was 336.98 degrees. The subjects then performed a head-to-target repositioning test using a Sensory Motor Control-Oriented Rehabilitation™ LED Laser to evaluate their proprioceptive abilities as a measurement of their head repositioning accuracy (HRA). The repositioning test was performed and the HRA was measured in the sagittal and transverse planes. Coordinate points from the target were converted to linear displacement from the origin of the target. A Pearson correlation coefficient was performed to analyze the relationship between CROM and linear displacement in each plane. The correlation coefficient between CROM and Linear Displacement for flexion was 0.01, for extension was 0.14, for right rotation was 0.28, and for left rotation was 0.17. Right rotation exhibited a fair relationship between CROM and linear displacement, while all other planes showed little to no relationship between CROM and linear displacement.