Building up Borders: Political Framing and Anti-Immigration Attitudes in Hungary and the United States

Location

Snydor Performance Hall

Access Type

Open Access

Presentation Type

Oral presentation

Entry Number

2427

Start Date

4-16-2025 3:15 PM

End Date

4-16-2025 3:30 PM

School

School of Liberal Arts and Sciences

Department

Political Science

Keywords

Hungary, United States, Orban, Trump, Framing, Communication, Immigration, Securitization, Normalization, Xenophobia

Abstract

In the Summer of 2015, the European Union was faced with an unprecedented immigration crisis. In response, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán unleashed a vigorous anti-immigration campaign, focusing on the cultural, security, and economic threats that Hungary would be burdened with. This was done through negative political framing, via Orbán’s speech acts, the governing Fidesz-KDNP’s political propaganda, and the government’s control of the media. Furthermore, since 2016, the United States has experienced its own issue with immigration. This topic became and has remained one of the most salient for Donald Trump’s three presidential campaigns. Like Orbán, Trump has used negative political framing, via similar methods, such as speech acts, propaganda, and supportive media. The question of this research is to determine whether Orbán’s negative framing influenced Hungarian society and led to increased anti-immigrant and xenophobic attitudes, or not, along with increased securitization of the state and normalization of border-line rhetoric; this goal remains the same for the section on the United States and Donald Trump. Throughout this research, the data, which is supported by qualitative information and examples, would suggest that anti-immigrant and xenophobic attitudes did increase as a result of both Orbán and Trump’s anti-immigration campaign.

Primary Faculty Mentor(s)

Dr. David Richards, Dr. Nichole Sanders, Dr. Timothy Meinke

Primary Faculty Mentor(s) Department

International Relations, History, Political Science

Rights Statement

The right to download or print any portion of this material is granted by the copyright owner only for personal or educational use. The author/creator retains all proprietary rights, including copyright ownership. Any editing, other reproduction or other use of this material by any means requires the express written permission of the copyright owner. Except as provided above, or for any other use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.), you may not reproduce, republish, post, transmit or distribute any material from this web site in any physical or digital form without the permission of the copyright owner of the material.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 16th, 3:15 PM Apr 16th, 3:30 PM

Building up Borders: Political Framing and Anti-Immigration Attitudes in Hungary and the United States

Snydor Performance Hall

In the Summer of 2015, the European Union was faced with an unprecedented immigration crisis. In response, Prime Minister Viktor Orbán unleashed a vigorous anti-immigration campaign, focusing on the cultural, security, and economic threats that Hungary would be burdened with. This was done through negative political framing, via Orbán’s speech acts, the governing Fidesz-KDNP’s political propaganda, and the government’s control of the media. Furthermore, since 2016, the United States has experienced its own issue with immigration. This topic became and has remained one of the most salient for Donald Trump’s three presidential campaigns. Like Orbán, Trump has used negative political framing, via similar methods, such as speech acts, propaganda, and supportive media. The question of this research is to determine whether Orbán’s negative framing influenced Hungarian society and led to increased anti-immigrant and xenophobic attitudes, or not, along with increased securitization of the state and normalization of border-line rhetoric; this goal remains the same for the section on the United States and Donald Trump. Throughout this research, the data, which is supported by qualitative information and examples, would suggest that anti-immigrant and xenophobic attitudes did increase as a result of both Orbán and Trump’s anti-immigration campaign.