Archived Abstracts
Media Content Analysis of Governmental Impact on Terrorist Reporting
Location
Room 214, Schewel Hall
Access Type
Campus Access Only
Entry Number
33
Start Date
4-8-2020 1:45 PM
End Date
4-8-2020 2:00 PM
Abstract
Terrorism would not be an issue without reactions from the media. Additionally, when terrorism occurs, the government has to respond to it. Therefore, if both have a connection to terrorism, how do they work together, how do they impact each other, and is the Agenda Setting Theory present? Using three recent attacks, the Boston Marathon Bombing, the Manchester Arena Attack, and the Orlando Nightclub Shooting, this paper analyzes the kind of wording used by the media and how the government influences that wording through press releases. The study hypothesizes that he neutral language of the media decreases after a government press release and is replaced by an increasing occurrence of charged language when the government provides an update or new information. Using four neutral words: bombing or shooting, incident/event, investigation, and attack, as well as four charged words: ‘terror’, Islamist, extremist, and criminal, a content analysis will be done on articles from CNN, Fox News, New York Times, The Times,Le Monde, and Irish Independentpublished before and after a government press release about each event. When comparing how often each word occurs, the hypothesis was not supported by the data, but through this research, the international relations and communications fields know that there is a dead end here that does not require more research.
Faculty Mentor(s)
Dr. Marek Payerhin Dr. David Richards
Rights Statement
The right to download or print any portion of this material is granted by the copyright owner only for personal or educational use. The author/creator retains all proprietary rights, including copyright ownership. Any editing, other reproduction or other use of this material by any means requires the express written permission of the copyright owner. Except as provided above, or for any other use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.), you may not reproduce, republish, post, transmit or distribute any material from this web site in any physical or digital form without the permission of the copyright owner of the material.
Media Content Analysis of Governmental Impact on Terrorist Reporting
Room 214, Schewel Hall
Terrorism would not be an issue without reactions from the media. Additionally, when terrorism occurs, the government has to respond to it. Therefore, if both have a connection to terrorism, how do they work together, how do they impact each other, and is the Agenda Setting Theory present? Using three recent attacks, the Boston Marathon Bombing, the Manchester Arena Attack, and the Orlando Nightclub Shooting, this paper analyzes the kind of wording used by the media and how the government influences that wording through press releases. The study hypothesizes that he neutral language of the media decreases after a government press release and is replaced by an increasing occurrence of charged language when the government provides an update or new information. Using four neutral words: bombing or shooting, incident/event, investigation, and attack, as well as four charged words: ‘terror’, Islamist, extremist, and criminal, a content analysis will be done on articles from CNN, Fox News, New York Times, The Times,Le Monde, and Irish Independentpublished before and after a government press release about each event. When comparing how often each word occurs, the hypothesis was not supported by the data, but through this research, the international relations and communications fields know that there is a dead end here that does not require more research.