Relationship between Self-Selected Pacing Strategy and Lactate Response in Individual Medley Time Trials
Location
Hopwood Auditorium
Access Type
Campus Access Only
Entry Number
69
Start Date
4-5-2023 3:30 PM
End Date
4-5-2023 3:45 PM
College
College of Health Sciences
Department
Exercise Physiology
Keywords
pacing, blood lactate, time till completion, Division III
Abstract
The 200 and 400-yard individual medley (IM) are two swimming events that challenge swimmers' versatility. Each event has different physiological requirements, where the 200 IM is viewed as an anaerobic event and the 400 IM is an aerobic event. Additionally, the IMs require performance in all four competitive strokes in a specific order, butterfly, backstroke, breaststroke, and freestyle with each stroke requiring a different magnitude of intensity, efficiency, and speed.
Purpose: To study the different pacing strategies and blood lactate response during the 200 IM and 400 IM in NCAA Division III swimmers.
Methods: 10 NCAA Division III swimmers (age: 19.7 ± 0.95yrs, height: 169.0 ± 6.4cm, weight: 71.8 ± 0.95kg) performed simulated time trials of the 200 IM and 400IM during the competitive season. Blood lactate (BLA) was taken prior to warm-up, prior to racing, and at the completion of the time trial. ΔBLA was calculated from the pre and post-BLA. Splits were taken for each lap (50 yards) of each stroke as well as segment (50 and 100 yards) velocities were calculated. Additionally, the percent of the total time each stroke took was also calculated. Multiple repeated measures ANOVAs were used to determine significant differences.
Results: No significant differences (p>0.05) were reported between the BLA Post 2IM (8.9±3.2) and BLA Post 4IM (8.87±2.4), nor in ΔBLA2IM (7.56±3.25) and ΔBLA4IM (6.11±2.82). RPE was found to be significantly (p<0.01) greater following the 4IM (9.1±0.88) versus the 2IM (7.4±0.84). Significant interactions were found (p<0.05) between the stroke velocities and stroke percentage of total time for the 2IM and 4IM.
Conclusion: BLA showed that there was an equivalent amount of fatigue between the 2IM and 4IM but the exertion requirement was different. Butterfly’s velocity and butterfly, backstroke, and freestyle stroke percentage of total time played a significant role in the difference between pacing strategies between 2IM and 4 IM
Faculty Mentor(s)
Dr. Sean M Collins Dr. Price Blair Dr. Jeffrey Herrick
Rights Statement
The right to download or print any portion of this material is granted by the copyright owner only for personal or educational use. The author/creator retains all proprietary rights, including copyright ownership. Any editing, other reproduction or other use of this material by any means requires the express written permission of the copyright owner. Except as provided above, or for any other use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.), you may not reproduce, republish, post, transmit or distribute any material from this web site in any physical or digital form without the permission of the copyright owner of the material.
Relationship between Self-Selected Pacing Strategy and Lactate Response in Individual Medley Time Trials
Hopwood Auditorium
The 200 and 400-yard individual medley (IM) are two swimming events that challenge swimmers' versatility. Each event has different physiological requirements, where the 200 IM is viewed as an anaerobic event and the 400 IM is an aerobic event. Additionally, the IMs require performance in all four competitive strokes in a specific order, butterfly, backstroke, breaststroke, and freestyle with each stroke requiring a different magnitude of intensity, efficiency, and speed.
Purpose: To study the different pacing strategies and blood lactate response during the 200 IM and 400 IM in NCAA Division III swimmers.
Methods: 10 NCAA Division III swimmers (age: 19.7 ± 0.95yrs, height: 169.0 ± 6.4cm, weight: 71.8 ± 0.95kg) performed simulated time trials of the 200 IM and 400IM during the competitive season. Blood lactate (BLA) was taken prior to warm-up, prior to racing, and at the completion of the time trial. ΔBLA was calculated from the pre and post-BLA. Splits were taken for each lap (50 yards) of each stroke as well as segment (50 and 100 yards) velocities were calculated. Additionally, the percent of the total time each stroke took was also calculated. Multiple repeated measures ANOVAs were used to determine significant differences.
Results: No significant differences (p>0.05) were reported between the BLA Post 2IM (8.9±3.2) and BLA Post 4IM (8.87±2.4), nor in ΔBLA2IM (7.56±3.25) and ΔBLA4IM (6.11±2.82). RPE was found to be significantly (p<0.01) greater following the 4IM (9.1±0.88) versus the 2IM (7.4±0.84). Significant interactions were found (p<0.05) between the stroke velocities and stroke percentage of total time for the 2IM and 4IM.
Conclusion: BLA showed that there was an equivalent amount of fatigue between the 2IM and 4IM but the exertion requirement was different. Butterfly’s velocity and butterfly, backstroke, and freestyle stroke percentage of total time played a significant role in the difference between pacing strategies between 2IM and 4 IM