Effects of Type of Information on Knowledge, Perception, and Myth Beliefs of Human Trafficking

Location

Room 217, Schewel Hall

Access Type

Campus Access Only

Entry Number

114

Start Date

4-5-2023 9:00 AM

End Date

4-5-2023 9:15 AM

College

Lynchburg College of Arts and Sciences

Department

Psychology

Keywords

Human trafficking, myths, perceptions, knowledge, emotional, and factual

Abstract

The term “human trafficking” is often misinterpreted and misperceived in many different ways. There are many myths and false beliefs that change the perceptions and attitudes towards trafficking and victims of trafficking (Cunningham & Cromer, 2014). The current study aims to identify and clarify common myths and misconceptions about human trafficking and victims. This research is significant for its potential prevention of risk factors, but also to aid knowledge and change the perceptions and misconceptions of those who have been trafficked and human trafficking in general. Participants in the study completed a 19 question knowledge and perception questionnaire, took a 16 question true or false questionnaire on common myths about human trafficking, then were randomly assigned to either an emotional or factual video to watch, then took the knowledge and perception questionnaire and myth questionnaire again. It was found there was a significant difference between the scores on the pre and post-myth test scores on the pre and post- perception scores, as perception went down after viewing the video. There was a significant difference in the pre and post- knowledge test scores for participants that viewed the emotional video. This goes partially with the hypothesis, as it was hypothesized there would be an increase of knowledge of participants that viewed the factual video. It was found there was an increase of knowledge, but it did not depend on which video was viewed.

Faculty Mentor(s)

Dr. Alisha Marciano

Rights Statement

The right to download or print any portion of this material is granted by the copyright owner only for personal or educational use. The author/creator retains all proprietary rights, including copyright ownership. Any editing, other reproduction or other use of this material by any means requires the express written permission of the copyright owner. Except as provided above, or for any other use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.), you may not reproduce, republish, post, transmit or distribute any material from this web site in any physical or digital form without the permission of the copyright owner of the material.

Share

Import Event to Google Calendar

COinS
 
Apr 5th, 9:00 AM Apr 5th, 9:15 AM

Effects of Type of Information on Knowledge, Perception, and Myth Beliefs of Human Trafficking

Room 217, Schewel Hall

The term “human trafficking” is often misinterpreted and misperceived in many different ways. There are many myths and false beliefs that change the perceptions and attitudes towards trafficking and victims of trafficking (Cunningham & Cromer, 2014). The current study aims to identify and clarify common myths and misconceptions about human trafficking and victims. This research is significant for its potential prevention of risk factors, but also to aid knowledge and change the perceptions and misconceptions of those who have been trafficked and human trafficking in general. Participants in the study completed a 19 question knowledge and perception questionnaire, took a 16 question true or false questionnaire on common myths about human trafficking, then were randomly assigned to either an emotional or factual video to watch, then took the knowledge and perception questionnaire and myth questionnaire again. It was found there was a significant difference between the scores on the pre and post-myth test scores on the pre and post- perception scores, as perception went down after viewing the video. There was a significant difference in the pre and post- knowledge test scores for participants that viewed the emotional video. This goes partially with the hypothesis, as it was hypothesized there would be an increase of knowledge of participants that viewed the factual video. It was found there was an increase of knowledge, but it did not depend on which video was viewed.