Archived Abstracts

A Conclusive History and Critique of the Cadenza

Student Author Information

Andrew Yi, University of LynchburgFollow

Location

Memorial Ballroom, Hall Campus Center

Access Type

Campus Access Only

Entry Number

34

Start Date

4-8-2020 12:00 PM

End Date

4-8-2020 1:15 PM

Department

Music

Abstract

The transformation of the cadenza from a cadence to a virtuosic work has changed how composers have approached composition, from improvisation to ornamentations. With the intent of improving music pedagogy, the purpose of this research was to trace the history of the cadenza. The particular problems of this study were to (1) determine the changes made in cadenza composition (c. 1500-present); (2) research arguments regarding whether or not cadenzas should be composed by the musician or composer; and (3) address criticisms of the modern cadenza (c. 1980-present).

The cadenza has changed from an idea that closed a composition to a virtuosic showcase of musical themes which highlighted the techniques of the performer. Cadenzas from the Classical Era (c. 1730-1820) were written by the composers and prevented musicians from adding self-expression. Researchers such as Author Joseph P. Swain (1988) argued that the modern cadenza cast a blemish on an established piece. This criticism acts as an effort to change what the cadenza means to modern musicians, as understanding what the cadenza truly means is what elevates a performance, not the perfection of its separate parts. The cadenza functions as a method to convey the understanding the musician has arrived.

Faculty Mentor(s)

Dr. Cynthia B. Ramsey

Rights Statement

The right to download or print any portion of this material is granted by the copyright owner only for personal or educational use. The author/creator retains all proprietary rights, including copyright ownership. Any editing, other reproduction or other use of this material by any means requires the express written permission of the copyright owner. Except as provided above, or for any other use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.), you may not reproduce, republish, post, transmit or distribute any material from this web site in any physical or digital form without the permission of the copyright owner of the material.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 8th, 12:00 PM Apr 8th, 1:15 PM

A Conclusive History and Critique of the Cadenza

Memorial Ballroom, Hall Campus Center

The transformation of the cadenza from a cadence to a virtuosic work has changed how composers have approached composition, from improvisation to ornamentations. With the intent of improving music pedagogy, the purpose of this research was to trace the history of the cadenza. The particular problems of this study were to (1) determine the changes made in cadenza composition (c. 1500-present); (2) research arguments regarding whether or not cadenzas should be composed by the musician or composer; and (3) address criticisms of the modern cadenza (c. 1980-present).

The cadenza has changed from an idea that closed a composition to a virtuosic showcase of musical themes which highlighted the techniques of the performer. Cadenzas from the Classical Era (c. 1730-1820) were written by the composers and prevented musicians from adding self-expression. Researchers such as Author Joseph P. Swain (1988) argued that the modern cadenza cast a blemish on an established piece. This criticism acts as an effort to change what the cadenza means to modern musicians, as understanding what the cadenza truly means is what elevates a performance, not the perfection of its separate parts. The cadenza functions as a method to convey the understanding the musician has arrived.