Archived Abstracts
WetBulb Globe Temperature and GPS Workload in Female Soccer Athletes
Location
Memorial Ballroom, Hall Campus Center
Access Type
Open Access
Entry Number
47
Start Date
4-8-2020 12:00 PM
End Date
4-8-2020 1:15 PM
Department
Athletic Training
Abstract
Our purpose was to understand the influence of environmental indices on the running intensity and body mass loss (BML) of women’s soccer players during preseason training. Eleven women's NCAA Division III (D3) soccer players (age= 20.09±1.04 y, height= 167.28±8.65 cm, mass= 60.18±5.42 kg) volunteered to wear GPS devices (Sports Performance Tracking, Melbourne, Australia) throughout all preseason practices (n=15). The combination of intensity, sRPE, and ΔBML explained 6.7% of the variance in WBGT (F1,155=5.06, P=0.002). Intensity (t156= -3.05, P=0.001) and sRPE (t156=3.60, P
Keywords: humidity, preseason, intensity, body mass loss, rate of perceived exertion.
Faculty Mentor(s)
Dr. Sean CollinsDr. Tom BowmanDr. Brittany Smith.
Rights Statement
The right to download or print any portion of this material is granted by the copyright owner only for personal or educational use. The author/creator retains all proprietary rights, including copyright ownership. Any editing, other reproduction or other use of this material by any means requires the express written permission of the copyright owner. Except as provided above, or for any other use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.), you may not reproduce, republish, post, transmit or distribute any material from this web site in any physical or digital form without the permission of the copyright owner of the material.
WetBulb Globe Temperature and GPS Workload in Female Soccer Athletes
Memorial Ballroom, Hall Campus Center
Our purpose was to understand the influence of environmental indices on the running intensity and body mass loss (BML) of women’s soccer players during preseason training. Eleven women's NCAA Division III (D3) soccer players (age= 20.09±1.04 y, height= 167.28±8.65 cm, mass= 60.18±5.42 kg) volunteered to wear GPS devices (Sports Performance Tracking, Melbourne, Australia) throughout all preseason practices (n=15). The combination of intensity, sRPE, and ΔBML explained 6.7% of the variance in WBGT (F1,155=5.06, P=0.002). Intensity (t156= -3.05, P=0.001) and sRPE (t156=3.60, P
Keywords: humidity, preseason, intensity, body mass loss, rate of perceived exertion.