Job Burnout among University of Lynchburg Staff

Location

Turner Gymnasium

Access Type

Campus Access Only

Entry Number

17

Start Date

4-5-2023 12:00 PM

End Date

4-5-2023 1:30 PM

College

College of Health Sciences

Department

Public Health

Keywords

Burnout, Staff Members, Faculty, Anxiety, Higher Education

Abstract

Background: Burnout can cause a person to feel mentally, physically, and emotionally exhausted, in addition to feeling overwhelmed and unappreciated. According to the latest Gallup poll, employees in education are among the most burned out groups in the United States. The purpose of this study was to identify if staff at the University of Lynchburg were experiencing job burnout and to what extent.

Methods: A survey was designed using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory Tool and distributed to all staff members during the Fall of 2022 using the all staff and faculty listserv. Job stress was defined in the survey using Mayo Clinic’s definition of “a state of physical or emotional exhaustion that also involves a sense of reduced accomplishment and loss of personal identity.”Descriptive and thematic analysis was used to summarize results.

Results: A total of 86 staff participated in the survey. Over two in three staff reported experiencing job burnout (72.2%), of the respondents stated that they have been experiencing burnout in the last three months due to the highly demanding workload (76.2%), dysfunctional workplace dynamics (57.4%), work-life imbalance (49.2%), and lack of job satisfaction (44.3%). Themes identified in the open-ended responses included staff members having to take on more work due to positions on campus being vacant, improving transparency and communication from administration, the need for stress-relieving activities, and the desire to have resources to help minimize burnout and improve work-life balance.

Conclusions: Job burnout was experienced by University of Lynchburg staff at the time of this survey. To reduce burnout levels, the administration must make changes to its policies to focus on improved transparency and communication. Educating staff members on how to identify burnout, providing opportunities that can help relieve stress, and providing resources to deal with stress and improve work-life balance are also recommended.

Faculty Mentor(s)

Dr. Jennifer Hall

Rights Statement

The right to download or print any portion of this material is granted by the copyright owner only for personal or educational use. The author/creator retains all proprietary rights, including copyright ownership. Any editing, other reproduction or other use of this material by any means requires the express written permission of the copyright owner. Except as provided above, or for any other use that is allowed by fair use (Title 17, §107 U.S.C.), you may not reproduce, republish, post, transmit or distribute any material from this web site in any physical or digital form without the permission of the copyright owner of the material.

Share

Import Event to Google Calendar

COinS
 
Apr 5th, 12:00 PM Apr 5th, 1:30 PM

Job Burnout among University of Lynchburg Staff

Turner Gymnasium

Background: Burnout can cause a person to feel mentally, physically, and emotionally exhausted, in addition to feeling overwhelmed and unappreciated. According to the latest Gallup poll, employees in education are among the most burned out groups in the United States. The purpose of this study was to identify if staff at the University of Lynchburg were experiencing job burnout and to what extent.

Methods: A survey was designed using the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory Tool and distributed to all staff members during the Fall of 2022 using the all staff and faculty listserv. Job stress was defined in the survey using Mayo Clinic’s definition of “a state of physical or emotional exhaustion that also involves a sense of reduced accomplishment and loss of personal identity.”Descriptive and thematic analysis was used to summarize results.

Results: A total of 86 staff participated in the survey. Over two in three staff reported experiencing job burnout (72.2%), of the respondents stated that they have been experiencing burnout in the last three months due to the highly demanding workload (76.2%), dysfunctional workplace dynamics (57.4%), work-life imbalance (49.2%), and lack of job satisfaction (44.3%). Themes identified in the open-ended responses included staff members having to take on more work due to positions on campus being vacant, improving transparency and communication from administration, the need for stress-relieving activities, and the desire to have resources to help minimize burnout and improve work-life balance.

Conclusions: Job burnout was experienced by University of Lynchburg staff at the time of this survey. To reduce burnout levels, the administration must make changes to its policies to focus on improved transparency and communication. Educating staff members on how to identify burnout, providing opportunities that can help relieve stress, and providing resources to deal with stress and improve work-life balance are also recommended.